Modified Cadillac
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 18, 2012, 10:50:43 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Cadillac & LaSalle Club Grand National
Hosted by Florida Suncoast Region
June 13-16, 2012
St. Augustine Florida
80,128 Posts in 6,923 Topics by 581 Members
Latest Member: coupedekill
* Home Help Search Calendar Login Register
Modified Cadillac  |  Home  |  Discussion  |  Topic: 1967 Deville - Driver's side cyclinder head, what's this hole? 0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic. « previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 7 8 [9] Go Down Print
Author Topic: 1967 Deville - Driver's side cyclinder head, what's this hole?  (Read 4545 times)
Cad67Deville

Offline Offline

Posts: 250



« Reply #120 on: October 24, 2011, 12:55:48 PM »

Wow.  That IS expensive!  I'm not sure I could swallow that but it sure does look nice on your motor.

What can I say, I'm a sucker for a little bling!  Thanks again EZ.

That kickdown switch thats next to the ignition coil, have you ever removed it? I removed mine for my edlebrock and am making a custom bracket and everything for it all. Was yours kinda hard to turn? Or was is smooth?? I really wannna know so if i need to start looking for another one or that I'll be fine with mine

Yes I removed it when I painted the bracket, it turns easily. However at one point it didn't and the part that sticks out next to the carb broke off.  Still on my to do list....


* IMG_1058.jpg (43.41 KB, 478x640 - viewed 34 times.)

* IMG_1060.jpg (53.4 KB, 640x478 - viewed 34 times.)
Logged

Trevor
1967 Cadillac DeVille Convertible
1957 Porsche 356A Coupe
Cad67Deville

Offline Offline

Posts: 250



« Reply #121 on: November 17, 2011, 04:20:08 PM »

I'm thinking of replacing the body mounts on my car.  I notice that the driver's side rear mount (rubber donut) under the trunk has become really cracked and brittle.  I've found a source (http://www.classicindustries.com/impala/parts/bm1006b.html) and am just curious on two issues to get your guys opinion:

1. Rubber or polyurethane? Only ten bucks more for the poly. $80 vs &90.
2. Do it myself or take it to a garage that has a lift and have them do it?
Logged

Trevor
1967 Cadillac DeVille Convertible
1957 Porsche 356A Coupe
pdxmose

Offline Offline

Posts: 1,024



« Reply #122 on: November 17, 2011, 04:47:19 PM »

I'd say the biggest problem you would run into is bolts that break off in the captive nuts.  Especially around the rear axle area.  Either way you choose, save yourself some grief/cost.  Blow out all the dirt and soak them all really well with your favorite penetrating oil a week or two before.

It's not that bad of a job if you have a floor jack or two, some wood blocks, dry space, time, etc.  You only need to pick it up far enough to clear the nose on the mounts, about 1-2".  The worse ones for rust/access are probably the ones that attach the front fenders to the upper bumper corners.

There's not that many items that need to be removed or closely watched.  Brake lines/MC, shift linkage, bat cable and starter ground, tranny cooler lines.  And steering rag joint will probably need to be removed.  Might be able to loosen the gas tank and unbolt the filler tube and let it just hang as the front hangs from the body while the back (fill tube) goes through the frame.  And I think your car still has bumper mounts in the back corner of the trunk that would need to have the bolts removed.

Hopefully this might help you decide on a path.

          ...mose
Logged

1966 Deville 4DHT --- 1971 Buick Riviera --- 1972 M44A2 (duece-and-a-half) --- 1953 Olds 98 --- 1937 Packard 115
Cad67Deville

Offline Offline

Posts: 250



« Reply #123 on: November 19, 2011, 12:17:19 PM »

Thanks Mose, good tips/advice.

Anyone else have any thoughts on rubber vs poly?  Supposedly the poly is stiffer and makes the car handle a little better and feel tighter.
Logged

Trevor
1967 Cadillac DeVille Convertible
1957 Porsche 356A Coupe
Gary
Administrator

Offline Offline

Posts: 494



« Reply #124 on: November 20, 2011, 08:40:33 AM »

Trevor
I would shy away from the poly as it would be (IMHO) more likely to squeak.
The rubber lasted for decades and performs well when protected from UV.
And I fail to see how a body mount would affect handling in a full frame car. I  could see how a suspension bushing from poly would enhance handling, but not a body mount.

Gary
Logged
Cad67Deville

Offline Offline

Posts: 250



« Reply #125 on: November 22, 2011, 10:39:54 PM »

Thanks Gary. Yeah squeaking would suck.

Anybody use new body mounts (rubber or poly) and have feedback to report?
Logged

Trevor
1967 Cadillac DeVille Convertible
1957 Porsche 356A Coupe
EZ

Offline Offline

Posts: 2,031



« Reply #126 on: November 23, 2011, 06:46:20 PM »

I bought all new body mounts and I went with the rubber ones.  Body mounts don't make the car handle better they just insulate the interior from vibrations.  Polyurethane body mounts would transmit a lot more of the noise/vibrations into the interior of the car in  my opinion.  Stick with the rubber ones.  I think you'll be happier.
Logged

EZ
1966 Cadillac Coupe DeVille
Ringgold, GA.

TORQUE IT DOWN 'TILL IT STRIPS.......THEN BACK IT OFF HALF A TURN.
Cad67Deville

Offline Offline

Posts: 250



« Reply #127 on: November 24, 2011, 01:08:17 AM »

Cool, thanks for the recommendation EZ.  Have a good Thanksgiving!
Logged

Trevor
1967 Cadillac DeVille Convertible
1957 Porsche 356A Coupe
Cad67Deville

Offline Offline

Posts: 250



« Reply #128 on: March 09, 2012, 12:44:29 AM »

A few months later...

I still haven't done the body mounts but I have been driving it regularly.  I felt that the steering seemed a little too vague though and I didn't like the amount of play in the steering wheel.  So I decided to take a look underneath, the steering coupler seemed to be pretty worn, so I took it off and replaced it with a new one from my local auto parts store for $8.61.  I tell this story only to say that if anyone is thinking about doing some routine maintenance, add this one to the list for the safety factor alone!  It took me about 2 hours (I work slow) and two beers and that included running to the store for the part. 

Check out the picture, the holes at 3 and 9 are split on the outsides, at 6 o'clock it is totally split all the way through.


* IMG_1823.jpg (351.12 KB, 640x478 - viewed 11 times.)
Logged

Trevor
1967 Cadillac DeVille Convertible
1957 Porsche 356A Coupe
Gary
Administrator

Offline Offline

Posts: 494



« Reply #129 on: March 09, 2012, 08:30:42 AM »

Good work.
I bet you'll feel safer driving it.

Gary
Logged
Cad67Deville

Offline Offline

Posts: 250



« Reply #130 on: March 09, 2012, 12:08:39 PM »

Yeah Gary, absolutely!  Only wish I would have checked it sooner.
Logged

Trevor
1967 Cadillac DeVille Convertible
1957 Porsche 356A Coupe
tedsled66

Offline Offline

Posts: 212



« Reply #131 on: March 09, 2012, 12:24:44 PM »

Hole-ie crap! A must fix. Thanks for the photo.
Logged

1966 Coupe Deville Convertible (used in my Wedding!)
1970 Coupe Deville (R.I.P.)
MCLC wannabe
robtroxel
MCLC Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 6


« Reply #132 on: March 25, 2012, 06:47:31 PM »

Tevor,

Thanks for taking the time to chronicle the work you have done on your car!  A first rate job all the way. Stay will the rubber body mount donuts.  How did the starter situation play out?

Regards,

Rob Troxel
Logged
Cad67Deville

Offline Offline

Posts: 250



« Reply #133 on: March 26, 2012, 02:26:19 PM »

Hey Rob,

Yeah my pleasure to document it, I am glad to have had the help of everyone on this forum along the way.  On the starter, after I hollowed out the heat riser no more hot starting problems, even with the stock starter so that is what I stayed with.
Logged

Trevor
1967 Cadillac DeVille Convertible
1957 Porsche 356A Coupe
Pages: 1 ... 7 8 [9] Go Up Print 
Modified Cadillac  |  Home  |  Discussion  |  Topic: 1967 Deville - Driver's side cyclinder head, what's this hole? « previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.16 | SMF © 2006-2011, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.078 seconds with 21 queries.